Anarchy vs. Liberalism Essay -- Politics Political Ideologies

Contemporary liberal and anarchist philosophy are both two very different ways of trying to see what would be the silk hat way to run order of magnitude. While discussing these two ideologies I will try to show how both, in their purist sense, are not able work in todays society effectively. Contemporary liberals are involved in every day politics exactly through over regulation and dependence on regimen they broad their chances of running a reliable democracy. Anarchist have very good ideas of how a natural society could function without government or modern institutions but the biggest problem they have is how to get to that point.Both theories understand good on paper but in one case they hit the real world they change due(p) to alternating conceptions and individual influences. The root of the word anarchism comes from the Greek word anarchos, which means without ruler. The main philosophy behind anarchism is that people passel reside in an unregulated community with no r eal assurance and maintain a sustainable life. Anarchists see government and capitalism as an institution that creates liberty for the rich and enslavement of the masses. Emma Goldman best describes anarchism as The philosophy of a new social order based on liberty unrestricted by man-made law the possible action that all forms of government rest on violence and are therefore wrong and harmful, as well as unnecessary.With anarchism there is a belief that once all government is abolished by the people that everyone will come together in a community of mutual aid and understanding without laws or authority to direct. Their philosophy can be considered other of most other ideologies, especially that of contemporary liberalism. Contemporary liberalism strives to hold on to the classic liberals ideals pertaining to political, economic, and social liberties but it tends to look at democratic government as a tool rather than a hindrance. John Stuart Mill, John Dewey, and Franklin D. Ro osevelt are established ideologues of contemporary liberalism. Just opposite of anarchism, modern liberalism puts its faith in government to change and adapt to the failures of capitalism.The emergence of this political philosophy started around the end of the nineteenth century with John Stuart Mills ideas in his book Principles of Political Economy. The philosophy became an ideology in the twentieth century with the main points of enh... ...Anarchy in theory seems like a very good idea. I would love to live in a society where you just did what was good for you and helped others while they helped you. I dont know why anyone wouldnt want to live in a society like that. The only problem is that to get to this utopian society the whole world would have to spontaneously decide they wanted it and I can guarantee there are many politicians and CEOs that would not like that. Contemporary liberals are right in wanting to reform institutions of today but I cant see how over regulation of g overnment in all areas is going to help fix things. I do see the need for some government action towards the eradication of poverty, equal rights, and unemployment.Bibliography Citations What is anarchism, An Anarchist FAQWebpage,www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1931/, Internet Explorer, 5/4/98. Schumaker Paul, Dwight C. Kiel, Thomas Heilke, Great Ideas/Grand Schemes Political Ideologies in the 19th and 20th Centuries, sore York, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 1996. Schumaker Paul, Dwight C. Kiel, Thomas W. Heilke, Ideological Voices An Anthology in Modern Political Ideas, New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997.